FREE Shipping (48 States) on orders over $200! ... 2019-20 RC Chili Bowl Champion!

Ceramic Bearings: Real or Hype

Ceramic bearings continue to be talked about as if it is the holy grail of performance in motors. There is certainly a big gain when ceramic bearings are used in an entire car and chassis. Replacing 15 or so bearings in car is very evident just spinning the wheels and on the track the car performs like it lost 25% of its mass.

Let's talk about the types of ceramic bearings. In the hobby, there are two basic types: Hybrid and Full Ceramic. I have seen some full ceramics listed as having special coatings, but have not examined their claims of increased performance.

Full Ceramic sounds just like what it is, a bearing in which the race and the balls are a true ceramic material. These bearings have the lowest rolling resistance of any bearing system using contact between the components. And while the type of ceramic materials have become better, they are sensitive to impact forces, meaning they break easily when struck. Besides very high prices (compared to steel ball bearings), they are not suitable for our hobby.

A Hybrid Ceramic bearing uses balls made of silicon nitride ceramic material (and other special ceramics) and steel races which are coated with a special material. The rolling resistance is higher than a full ceramic ball bearing, but impact damage resistance is greatly increased and prices are more reasonable, and are very good compromise.

In motor testing on my dyno, I do not see consistent gains when using ceramic bearings in the modified motor types. In testing motors multiple times, I see a 1% gain sometimes, a 5% another, and then another time -3% gain (or loss!). When asked about dyno tuning, I always say it gives you a pointer in a direction for gains, not a definitive absolute of 'this motor is better than a different motor'. I see trends when testing motor designs when I have enough to compare, such as when using my motor designs as I have hundreds to test and then look at all the data. I then can say that yes this setup is better than the other setup. In the end, motor testing really involves on track testing with well setup cars and talented drivers. I am fortunate to have some of the best drivers, and their cars, to do the down and dirty work of what motor works by running cars on a track.

So, is it worth the cost (and weekly maintenance of cleaning and relube) to use ceramic bearings in motors? The best way to say this from my perspective is that I do not use ceramic bearings in any of the team driver's modified motors. In the low power spec classes, such as 25.5 to 13.5 turn 2 pole motors, hybrid ceramics have the greatest effect, and may be worth the effort. Even at very large races, it would be a big maintenance burden and I am not sure I see the advantage. We now have a lot of power in brushless motors compared to the brushed motor days; those distant brushed motors needed all the help they could get, especially the stock motors we used at the time. Two ceramic bearings locating a small spinning mass in brushless motors is just very hard to see or feel on the dyno.
BUT, for those who want them, I do have ceramic bearings!

Leave a comment

Please note, comments must be approved before they are published